The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Long-Term and Large-Scale Perspectives on the Relationship between Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning
Abstract
Abstract In a growing body of literature from a variety of ecosystems is strong evidence that various components of biodiversity have significant impacts on ecosystem functioning. However, much of this evidence comes from short-term, small-scale experiments in which communities are synthesized from relatively small species pools and conditions are highly controlled. Extrapolation of the results of such experiments to longer time scales and larger spatial scales—those of whole ecosystems—is difficult because the experiments do not incorporate natural processes such as recruitment limitation and colonization of new species. We show how long-term study of planned and accidental changes in species richness and composition suggests that the effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning will vary over time and space. More important, we also highlight areas of uncertainty that need to be addressed through coordinated cross-scale and cross-site research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Biodiversity is likely to affect ecosystem functioning most strongly at small spatial scales.
“and so it is at the small scale that biodiversity is most likely to have an important impact on the functioning of ecosystems (13 -15).”
From Global meta-analysis reveals no net change in local-scale plant biodiversity over time (2013) · cites this paper as [14]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 233
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Naeem, 1998, Conservation Biology, 12, 39, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96379.x · DOI
- Tilman, 1999, Ecology, 80, 1455
- Vanni, 1997, Ecology, 78, 1
Metadata
- Authors
- SYMSTAD, A. J., CHAPIN, F. S., WALL, D. H., GROSS, K. L., HUENNEKE, L. F., MITTELBACH, G. G., PETERS, D. P. C., & TILMAN, D.
- Affiliations
- United States Geological Survey (US)
- University of Alaska Fairbanks (US)
- Colorado State University (US)
- Kellogg Biological Station Long Term Ecological Research (US)
- New Mexico State University (US)
- Venue
- BioScience
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89
- ISSN
- 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2181128270
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 17.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BioScience (publishedVersion)
- BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
- Keywords
- biodiversity-ecosystem functioning, long-term ecological research, spatial scale, time scales, species richness, species composition, recruitment limitation, colonization, community assembly, uncertainty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review